A note from Daniel

The participants responsible for the first, money-losing decision (allocating 10 million to a division of a company which then underperformed other divisions for 5 years and suffered a lot of losses) directed nearly 50% more of the $20 million budget (second resource allocation decision) to that same division, compared with others with the identical information (history of losses) and corporate history but no personal responsibility for prior policy decision. Staw's work reveals just how much past history with a decision can influence you to escalate commitment when someone fresh to the decision might quit.

Daniel Quit, page 99 · September 2, 2024 Save to shelf
Notes like this take four seconds in Booksense. Scan the paragraph, it lands on the right page, and comes back for review later. Take your first note

More from readers of Quit

Daniel p. 247
Daniel p. 247

More from Daniel

See their profile

Stop losing the best parts of what you read.

Booksense pushes your highlights back to you for review, so a note from page 174 is still yours a year later. Free on iOS.

Daniel on Booksense 5,999 notes 387 hours of reading