A note from Daniel

A perfectly rational decision-maker would consider only the future costs and benefits in deciding whether to continue with a course of action. In other words, if continuing on has a positive expected value, a rational actor would persevere. If it has a negative expected value, they would quit. Forty years of experiments and fieldwork across a variety of domains show that people behave as Thaler hypothesized regarding sunk costs. In decisions about whether to move forward, they do take into account what they've already spent. They do this because they irrationally think that the only way to recover or justify the costs is if they continue on.

Daniel Quit, page 89 · August 26, 2024 Save to shelf
Notes like this take four seconds in Booksense. Scan the paragraph, it lands on the right page, and comes back for review later. Take your first note

More from readers of Quit

Daniel p. 247
Daniel p. 247

More from Daniel

See their profile

Stop losing the best parts of what you read.

Booksense pushes your highlights back to you for review, so a note from page 174 is still yours a year later. Free on iOS.

Daniel on Booksense 5,999 notes 387 hours of reading